These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15212244)
21. U.S. budget. Democratic Congress begins to put its stamp on science. Kintisch E Science; 2007 Jun; 316(5833):1828-9. PubMed ID: 17600191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Republican spending plan casts shadow on science. Maxmen A Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7412):441. PubMed ID: 22914144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan. Science News Staff Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Science after a year of President Trump. Nature; 2018 Jan; 553(7689):380. PubMed ID: 29368710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Time to stop relying on things past. Goldston D Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7429):313. PubMed ID: 23257843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Congress boosts EPA's R&D funding. Cooney CM Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Feb; 36(3):56A-57A. PubMed ID: 11871573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. EPA's ozone standard may harm public health and welfare. Dudley SE; Gramm WL Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 9323870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental economics. An economic perspective on the EPA's Clean Power Plan. Fowlie M; Goulder L; Kotchen M; Borenstein S; Bushnell J; Davis L; Greenstone M; Kolstad C; Knittel C; Stavins R; Wara M; Wolak F; Wolfram C Science; 2014 Nov; 346(6211):815-6. PubMed ID: 25395524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How Earth-observation scientists are weathering budget cuts and political scepticism. Kent KJ Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7722):S5-S7. PubMed ID: 30209381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cuts loom for US science. Semeniuk I; Thompson H Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. US science agencies set to win big in budget deal. Morello L; Guglielmi G Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7698):572. PubMed ID: 29595772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. "Transparency" as Mask? The EPA's Proposed Rule on Scientific Data. Schwartz J N Engl J Med; 2018 Oct; 379(16):1496-1497. PubMed ID: 30156992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. PHS in the Queen City: a watershed development. Snyder LP Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 9258300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EPA in the crosshairs. Chameides WL Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6028):397. PubMed ID: 21512005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Log-jam in agency confirmations. Morello L Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):418-9. PubMed ID: 23698419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Debating the health effects of DDT: Thomas Jukes, Charles Wurster, and the fate of an environmental pollutant. Conis E Public Health Rep; 2010; 125(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 20297762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. New "21st Century Cures" Legislation: Speed and Ease vs Science. Kesselheim AS; Avorn J JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(6):581-582. PubMed ID: 28056124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]