These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1521362)
1. Inaccuracy of electronic sphygmomanometers. Mann S Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1992 May; 19(5):304-6. PubMed ID: 1521362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010. Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT. El Assaad MA; Topouchian JA; Asmar RG Blood Press Monit; 2003 Jun; 8(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 12900590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG; Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer. Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer. Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E). Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring with concurrent auscultatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients. Semret M; Zidehsarai M; Agarwal R Blood Press Monit; 2005 Oct; 10(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 16205443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of home blood pressure-monitoring devices, Omron HEM-1020 and Omron i-Q132 (HEM-1010-E), according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Takahashi H; Yoshika M; Yokoi T Blood Press Monit; 2011 Aug; 16(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 21701384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of two automatic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2009 guidelines: the Omron BP765 (HEM-7311-ZSA) and the Omron BP760N (HEM-7320-Z). Takahashi H; Yoshika M; Yokoi T Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2015; 11():49-53. PubMed ID: 25657587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Park SH; Park YS Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic and automatic devices for home blood pressure measurement: comparison between cuff-oscillometric and microphone methods. Imai Y; Abe K; Sasaki S; Minami N; Munakata M; Sakuma H; Hashimoto J; Sekino H; Imai K; Yoshinaga K J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):983-90. PubMed ID: 2628499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes? Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How reliable is oscillometric blood pressure determination at the finger using the Omron device?]. Wambach G; Jacob R; Treeger A; Stimpel M Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1992 Oct; 81(42):1258-61. PubMed ID: 1411013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]