These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1521362)

  • 21. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.
    Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
    Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inaccuracy of wrist-cuff oscillometric blood pressure devices: an arm position artefact?
    Mourad A; Gillies A; Carney S
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Apr; 10(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 15812253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home measurement of blood pressure.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    J Hypertens; 1990 Jul; 8(7):621-34. PubMed ID: 2168452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
    Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
    J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
    Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
    Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of blood pressure measurements obtained with the Dinamap 845XT, the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and the London School of Hygiene device.
    Jenner DA; Beilin LJ; Vandongen R; DeKlerk NH
    Clin Exp Hypertens A; 1988; 10(4):575-88. PubMed ID: 3390961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled.
    Yarows SA
    Am J Hypertens; 2004 Jan; 17(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14700513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
    Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
    Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure of the community-based Vita-Stat automated blood pressure device to accurately measure blood pressure.
    Whitcomb BL; Prochazka A; LoVerde M; Byyny RL
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 May; 4(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 7742964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of the OMRON M4 automatic blood pressure measuring device.
    Naschitz JE; Loewenstein L; Lewis R; Keren D; Gaitini L; Tamir A; Yeshurun D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Jul; 14(7):423-7. PubMed ID: 10918546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Field testing in Suriname of two blood pressure-measuring devices for low-resource and middle-resource countries, according to a WHO protocol.
    Kewalbansing PV; Ishwardat AR; Brewster LM; Oehlers G; van Montfrans GA
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 23412397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.