448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1521422)
1. The technology, law, and ethics of in vitro fertilization, gamete donation, and surrogate motherhood.
Wasserman D; Wachbroit R
Clin Lab Med; 1992 Sep; 12(3):429-48. PubMed ID: 1521422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation.
Robertson JA
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive technology: in Israel, law, religious orthodoxy, and reproductive technologies.
Shapira A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S12-4. PubMed ID: 11644021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive technology: in Australia, the debate moves to embryo experimentation.
Waller L
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S21-2. PubMed ID: 11644025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family.
Rae SB; Core JH
Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating "the artificial family": an Austrian compromise.
Bernat E
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 11651382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
Andrews LB
ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies.
Herz EK
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel.
Shapira A
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Redefining parenthood and protecting embryos: why we need new laws.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 6500920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The shadowlands--secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(13):935-9. PubMed ID: 9744980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation.
Lorio KV
Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive technology: in the Netherlands, tolerance and debate.
De Wachter MA; De Wert GM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S15-6. PubMed ID: 11644022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative reproduction.
Andrews LB; Douglass L
South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):623-82. PubMed ID: 11645847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
