These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15214707)

  • 1. Male fetuses and the risk of cesarean delivery.
    Lurie S; Weissler A; Baider C; Hiaev Z; Sadan O; Glezerman M
    J Reprod Med; 2004 May; 49(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 15214707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different degrees of fetal oxidative stress in elective and emergent cesarean section.
    Lurie S; Matas Z; Boaz M; Fux A; Golan A; Sadan O
    Neonatology; 2007; 92(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 17377411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery.
    Gonen R; Bader D; Ajami M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 11084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of primary cesarean delivery.
    Getahun D; Kaminsky LM; Elsasser DA; Kirby RS; Ananth CV; Vintzileos AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 197(4):376.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17904966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Bush MC; McKeown AM; Lagrew NG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1638-43; discussion 1643. PubMed ID: 16731082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-reassuring fetal status in the prolonged pregnancy: the impact of fetal weight.
    Sylvestre G; Fisher M; Westgren M; Divon MY
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 18(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 11555454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of abnormal results of outpatient fetal heart rate monitoring on maternal intervention in labor.
    Lamvu GM; Thorp JM; Stuart N; Hartmann KE
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Sep; 51(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 17039696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric presence at cesarean section: justified or not?
    Gordon A; McKechnie EJ; Jeffery H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 1):599-605. PubMed ID: 16150248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor.
    Bergholt T; Lim LK; Jørgensen JS; Robson MS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):163.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accidental fetal lacerations during cesarean delivery: experience in an Italian level III university hospital.
    Dessole S; Cosmi E; Balata A; Uras L; Caserta D; Capobianco G; Ambrosini G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1673-7. PubMed ID: 15547541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Incidence and indication for cesarean section at the Central Military Hospital of Mexico].
    Olivares Morales AS; Santiago Ramirez JA; Cortes Ramirez P
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1996 Feb; 64():79-84. PubMed ID: 8714069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
    Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The association between glucose challenge test, obesity and pregnancy outcome in 6390 non-diabetic women.
    Yogev Y; Langer O; Xenakis EM; Rosenn B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jan; 17(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15804783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.