349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15216615)
41. The case for a Missouri stabilization fund.
Reintjes SL
Mo Med; 2005; 102(6):500-1. PubMed ID: 16355631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform.
Zeiler K
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Insurance. California, here we come.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Oct; 76(10):16, 18, 4. PubMed ID: 12416453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tort reform under attack.
Conde C
Tex Med; 2008 Mar; 104(3):27-30. PubMed ID: 18610870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Health courts.
Kopen DF
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Aug; 91(8):48. PubMed ID: 18557074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The forecast: blue skies for the Missouri JUA with winds from the west carrying the Stabilization Fund.
Gates LG
Mo Med; 2009; 106(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19397102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Medical malpractice crisis: Florida's recent experience.
Cline RE; Pepine CJ
Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(24):2936-8. PubMed ID: 15210608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Tort reform in Oklahoma.
Vanhooser JR
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2009 Jan; 102(1):36. PubMed ID: 19271642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. MSMS efforts to preserve Michigan's tort reform are paying off.
Madigan WE; Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2004; 103(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 14986520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The first of many? Ore. system settles Scruggs' charity-care lawsuit.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(45):14. PubMed ID: 16299981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. ['No cure, no pay' in Dutch health care: fear of a culture of unwarranted claims].
Legemaate J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Apr; 147(16):740-2. PubMed ID: 12731462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Safe harbors: liability reform for patients and physicians.
Ong C; Kachalia A
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 98(3):41-4. PubMed ID: 23540147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Medical malpractice and patient safety.
Marcus HR
N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(7):735; author reply 736. PubMed ID: 16921588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Into the breach: a look at medical malpractice liability reform.
Johnson P
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2004; 59(2):80-1. PubMed ID: 15134420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform".
Boehm G
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Commentary: binding early offers versus caps for medical malpractice claims?
O'Connell J
Milbank Q; 2007 Jun; 85(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 17517116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Legal harbinger? Consumer fraud settlement may lead to more.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Jun; 35(25):8-9. PubMed ID: 16004139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Presentation of the Commissions of Compensation and Redress].
Avram F
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2014; 198(4-5):703-7. PubMed ID: 26753402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. A medical mistake.
Schmitt CH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]