These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15216981)

  • 21. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows.
    Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive ability and covariance parameters of dynamic linear models for analysis of longitudinal traits.
    Forni S; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Dec; 87(12):3854-64. PubMed ID: 19684263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle.
    Meyer K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2005; 37(5):473-500. PubMed ID: 16093011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic evaluation and selection response for growth in meat-type quail through random regression models using B-spline functions and Legendre polynomials.
    Mota LFM; Martins PGMA; Littiere TO; Abreu LRA; Silva MA; Bonafé CM
    Animal; 2018 Apr; 12(4):667-674. PubMed ID: 28803586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R.
    Duangjinda M; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Druet T
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2997-3001. PubMed ID: 11811452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds.
    Roso VM; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16024696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Teat scores in first-parity Gelbvieh cows: relationship with suspensory score and calf growth traits.
    Sapp RL; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2277-84. PubMed ID: 15318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of locations of knots for linear splines in random regression test-day models.
    Jamrozik J; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Apr; 127(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 20433515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimates of direct and maternal covariance functions for growth of Australian beef calves from birth to weaning.
    Meyer K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(5):487-514. PubMed ID: 11712971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic evaluation of growth of Kenya Boran cattle using random regression models.
    Wasike CB; Indetie D; Pitchford WS; Ojango JM; Kahi AK
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2007 Oct; 39(7):493-505. PubMed ID: 17969712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimates of genetic parameters for growth traits in Brahman cattle using random regression and multitrait models.
    Bertipaglia TS; Carreño LO; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Boligon AA; Farah MM; Gomes FJ; Machado CH; Rey FS; da Fonseca R
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Aug; 93(8):3814-9. PubMed ID: 26440161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of genetic parameters for mature weight in Angus cattle.
    Costa RB; Misztal I; Elzo MA; Bertrand JK; Silva LO; Łukaszewicz M
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2680-6. PubMed ID: 21478454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Random regression models for the estimation of genetic and environmental covariance functions for growth traits in Santa Ines sheep.
    Sarmento JL; Torres RA; Sousa WH; Lôbo RN; Albuquerque LG; Lopes PS; Santos NP; Bignard AB
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Jun; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27323203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetic evaluation using multi-trait and random regression models in Simmental beef cattle.
    Mota RR; Marques LF; Lopes PS; da Silva LP; Neto FR; de Resende MD; Torres RA
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Jul; 12(3):2465-80. PubMed ID: 23979882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records.
    van der Werf JH; Goddard ME; Meyer K
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Dec; 81(12):3300-8. PubMed ID: 9891276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.
    Williams JL; Aguilar I; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):460-6. PubMed ID: 19820043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-breed genetic evaluation in a Gelbvieh population.
    Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Strabel T; Sapp RL; Sánchez JP; Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):286-95. PubMed ID: 17868081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of correlation between maternal permanent environmental effects of related dams in beef cattle.
    Iwaisaki H; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 15705749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic analysis of resistance to ticks, gastrointestinal nematodes and Eimeria spp. in Nellore cattle.
    Passafaro TL; Carrera JP; dos Santos LL; Raidan FS; dos Santos DC; Cardoso EP; Leite RC; Toral FL
    Vet Parasitol; 2015 Jun; 210(3-4):224-34. PubMed ID: 25899078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic parameters for body weight, hip height, and the ratio of weight to hip height from random regression analyses of Brahman feedlot cattle.
    Riley DG; Coleman SW; Chase CC; Olson TA; Hammond AC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 85(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17179538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.