BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15217480)

  • 1. Pollutant dispersion in a large indoor space. Part 2: Computational fluid dynamics predictions and comparison with a scale model experiment for isothermal flow.
    Finlayson EU; Gadgil AJ; Thatcher TL; Sextro RG
    Indoor Air; 2004 Aug; 14(4):272-83. PubMed ID: 15217480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pollutant dispersion in a large indoor space: Part 1 -- Scaled experiments using a water-filled model with occupants and furniture.
    Thatcher TL; Wilson DJ; Wood EE; Craig MJ; Sextro RG
    Indoor Air; 2004 Aug; 14(4):258-71. PubMed ID: 15217479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of gaseous pollutant dispersion around an isolated building using the k-ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model.
    Yu H; Thé J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 May; 67(5):517-536. PubMed ID: 27650217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the suitability of steady RANS CFD for forced mixing ventilation at transitional slot Reynolds numbers.
    van Hooff T; Blocken B; van Heijst GJ
    Indoor Air; 2013 Jun; 23(3):236-49. PubMed ID: 23094648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of the Brooklyn traffic real-time ambient pollutant penetration and environmental dispersion (B-TRAPPED) study: theoretical background and model for design of field experiments.
    Hahn I; Wiener RW; Richmond-Bryant J; Brixey LA; Henkle SW
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Dec; 11(12):2115-21. PubMed ID: 20024008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CFD simulation of pollutant dispersion around isolated buildings: on the role of convective and turbulent mass fluxes in the prediction accuracy.
    Gousseau P; Blocken B; van Heijst GJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Oct; 194():422-34. PubMed ID: 21880420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational fluid dynamics and room air movement.
    Nielsen PV
    Indoor Air; 2004; 14 Suppl 7():134-43. PubMed ID: 15330781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical simulation on pollutant dispersion from vehicle exhaust in street configurations.
    Yassin MF; Kellnerová R; Janour Z
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Sep; 156(1-4):257-73. PubMed ID: 18726702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study on gas diffusion emitted from different height of point source.
    Yassin MF
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Jan; 148(1-4):379-95. PubMed ID: 18307050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computational fluid dynamic modelling approach to assess the representativeness of urban monitoring stations.
    Santiago JL; Martín F; Martilli A
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jun; 454-455():61-72. PubMed ID: 23538137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deriving realistic source boundary conditions for a CFD simulation of concentrations in workroom air.
    Feigley CE; Do TH; Khan J; Lee E; Schnaufer ND; Salzberg DC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 May; 55(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 21422277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the construction and use of linear low-dimensional ventilation models.
    Cao SJ; Meyers J
    Indoor Air; 2012 Oct; 22(5):427-41. PubMed ID: 22313137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of indoor radon distribution using measurements and CFD modeling.
    Chauhan N; Chauhan RP; Joshi M; Agarwal TK; Aggarwal P; Sahoo BK
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 Oct; 136():105-11. PubMed ID: 24929505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of mathematical models for exposure assessment with computational fluid dynamic simulation.
    Bennett JS; Feigley CE; Khan J; Hosni MH
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jan; 15(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 10712068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative prediction of traffic pollutant transmission into buildings.
    Chang TJ; Huang MY; Wu YT; Liao CM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003 Jun; 38(6):1025-40. PubMed ID: 12774906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of turbulence anisotropy near walls in room airflow.
    Schälin A; Nielsen PV
    Indoor Air; 2004 Jun; 14(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 15104782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active-passive measurements and CFD based modelling for indoor radon dispersion study.
    Chauhan N; Chauhan RP
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jun; 144():57-61. PubMed ID: 25817925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing zonal and CFD model predictions of isothermal indoor airflows to experimental data.
    Mora L; Gadgil AJ; Wurtz E
    Indoor Air; 2003 Jun; 13(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 12756000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.