These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15217994)

  • 21. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?
    Saldeen P; Sundström P
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 15567878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
    Fiddelers AA; van Montfoort AP; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Dunselman GA; Janssen JM; Severens JL; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2090-7. PubMed ID: 16613886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality.
    Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1046-8. PubMed ID: 15016768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
    Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Sep; 7(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 15590571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
    Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer.
    Gleicher N; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16495304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention.
    Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(6):575-93. PubMed ID: 16123055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best?
    Griesinger G; Dafopoulos K; Schultze-Mosgau A; Felberbaum R; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1239-41. PubMed ID: 15105385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.
    Fiddelers AA; Severens JL; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17099208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates.
    van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
    Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Singleton live births should also include preterm births.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1943-5. PubMed ID: 15243003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is there a single 'parameter of excellence'?
    Pinborg A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Nyboe Andersen A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1052-4. PubMed ID: 15044405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer.
    Hamberger L; Hardarson T; Nygren KG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2005 Feb; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15758862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assisted reproductive technology : experience with IVF/ICSI.
    Rizvi JH; Zuberi NF; Bhatti S; Bana M; Virk S; Nadir S; Kidwai A; Tahir N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 May; 14(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 15225453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer.
    Poikkeus P; Gissler M; Unkila-Kallio L; Hyden-Granskog C; Tiitinen A
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Apr; 22(4):1073-9. PubMed ID: 17251357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.
    van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.