These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15218253)

  • 1. Use of whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation to detect chromosomal copy number alterations in cell line material and tumour tissue.
    Hughes S; Lim G; Beheshti B; Bayani J; Marrano P; Huang A; Squire JA
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 105(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 15218253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of whole genome amplification to study chromosomal changes in prostate cancer: insights into genome-wide signature of preneoplasia associated with cancer progression.
    Hughes S; Yoshimoto M; Beheshti B; Houlston RS; Squire JA; Evans A
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():65. PubMed ID: 16573809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large fragment Bst DNA polymerase for whole genome amplification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
    Aviel-Ronen S; Qi Zhu C; Coe BP; Liu N; Watson SK; Lam WL; Tsao MS
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():312. PubMed ID: 17156491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined genome-wide allelotyping and copy number analysis identify frequent genetic losses without copy number reduction in medulloblastoma.
    Langdon JA; Lamont JM; Scott DK; Dyer S; Prebble E; Bown N; Grundy RG; Ellison DW; Clifford SC
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2006 Jan; 45(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 16149064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of DNA copy number changes in microdissected serous ovarian cancer tissue using a cDNA microarray platform.
    Tsuda H; Birrer MJ; Ito YM; Ohashi Y; Lin M; Lee C; Wong WH; Rao PH; Lau CC; Berkowitz RS; Wong KK; Mok SC
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 15571795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of a novel homozygous deletion region at 6q23.1 in medulloblastomas using high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Hui AB; Takano H; Lo KW; Kuo WL; Lam CN; Tong CY; Chang Q; Gray JW; Ng HK
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Jul; 11(13):4707-16. PubMed ID: 16000565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.
    Tan NH; Palmer R; Wang R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 20178523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole genome amplification and molecular genetic analysis of DNA from paraffin-embedded prostate adenocarcinoma tumor tissue.
    Kim SH; Godfrey T; Jensen RH
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1512-8. PubMed ID: 10492247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimized amplification and fluorescent labeling of small cell samples for genomic array-CGH.
    Knijnenburg J; van der Burg M; Tanke HJ; Szuhai K
    Cytometry A; 2007 Aug; 71(8):585-91. PubMed ID: 17458882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The utility and limitation of single nucleotide polymorphism analysis on whole genome amplified mesenchymal tumour DNA in formalin fixed tumour samples.
    Liang CW; Lee YS; Marino-Enriquez A; Tsui K; Huang SH
    Pathology; 2012 Jan; 44(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22157688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic profiling by DNA amplification of laser capture microdissected tissues and array CGH.
    Cardoso J; Molenaar L; de Menezes RX; Rosenberg C; Morreau H; Möslein G; Fodde R; Boer JM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Oct; 32(19):e146. PubMed ID: 15514107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for further quantitative analysis with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Lee YS; Tsai CN; Tsai CL; Chang SD; Hsueh DW; Liu CT; Ma CC; Lin SH; Wang TH; Wang HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 47(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 18400580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple displacement amplification to create a long-lasting source of DNA for genetic studies.
    Lovmar L; Syvänen AC
    Hum Mutat; 2006 Jul; 27(7):603-14. PubMed ID: 16786504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a whole-genome amplification method based on adaptor-ligation PCR of randomly sheared genomic DNA.
    Tanabe C; Aoyagi K; Sakiyama T; Kohno T; Yanagitani N; Akimoto S; Sakamoto M; Sakamoto H; Yokota J; Ohki M; Terada M; Yoshida T; Sasaki H
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Oct; 38(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 12939744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limited tissue fixation times and whole genomic amplification do not impact array CGH profiles.
    Ghazani AA; Arneson NC; Warren K; Done SJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 16505285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
    Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
    Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.