These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1521846)
1. Health policy dilemmas related to high technology infertility services. Gennaro S; Klein A; Miranda L Image J Nurs Sch; 1992; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 1521846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization. Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted conception. Health services and evaluation. Lancaster PA Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):485-99. PubMed ID: 1778695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of an assisted reproduction program in the Armed Forces. Scott RT; Illions EH; Hayslip CC Mil Med; 1993 Feb; 158(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8441505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intentions and effects of the embryo protection regulation--sequelae for the public health service physician]. Kentenich H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Nov; 87(10-11):814-6. PubMed ID: 8303921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of assisted reproductive technology during diagnostic and operative infertility laparoscopy. Gindoff PR; Hall JL; Nelson LM; Stillman RJ Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):299-301. PubMed ID: 2137211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent advances in medically assisted conception. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1992; 820():1-111. PubMed ID: 1642014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Infertility, assisted reproduction programmes and public health. Kaminski M; Garel M Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1328-9. PubMed ID: 7593486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gamete intrafallopian transfer: ethical considerations, historical development of the procedure, and comparison with other advanced reproductive technologies. Mastroyannis C Fertil Steril; 1993 Sep; 60(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 8375514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The incidence of multiple pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, gamete, or zygote intrafallopian transfer. Bollen N; Camus M; Staessen C; Tournaye H; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem AC Fertil Steril; 1991 Feb; 55(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 1991529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current reproductive technology: considerations for the oncologist. Winkel CA; Fossum GT Oncology (Williston Park); 1993 Mar; 7(3):40-5; discussion 46-8, 51. PubMed ID: 8452778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamete intrafallopian transfer. A cost-effective alternative to donor oocyte in vitro fertilization in women aged 40-42 years. Silva PD; Olson KL; Meisch JK; Silva DE J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1019-22. PubMed ID: 9883404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health policy dilemmas related to high technology infertility services. Benton DC Image J Nurs Sch; 1993; 25(1):80. PubMed ID: 8449537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Leuprolide acetate-prepared in vitro fertilization-gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles: efficacy versus controls and cost analysis. Corson SL; Batzer FR; Gocial B; Eisenberg E; Huppert LC; Nelson JR Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 1740205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]