BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15219604)

  • 1. The lack of focused anticipation of verbal information in stutterers: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Walla P; Mayer D; Deecke L; Thurner S
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1321-7. PubMed ID: 15219604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single word reading in developmental stutterers and fluent speakers.
    Salmelin R; Schnitzler A; Schmitz F; Freund HJ
    Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1184-202. PubMed ID: 10825357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right rolandic activation during speech perception in stutterers: a MEG study.
    Biermann-Ruben K; Salmelin R; Schnitzler A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 15808980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voxel-based morphometry of auditory and speech-related cortex in stutterers.
    Beal DS; Gracco VL; Lafaille SJ; De Nil LF
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(12):1257-60. PubMed ID: 17632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.
    Bosshardt HG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):776-85. PubMed ID: 2273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of upper and lower lip muscle activity between stutterers and fluent speakers.
    de Felício CM; Freitas RL; Vitti M; Regalo SC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 71(8):1187-92. PubMed ID: 17512612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of simulated stuttering and prolonged speech on the neural activation patterns of stuttering and nonstuttering adults.
    De Nil LF; Beal DS; Lafaille SJ; Kroll RM; Crawley AP; Gracco VL
    Brain Lang; 2008 Nov; 107(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 18822455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential levels of speech and manual dysfluency in adults who stutter during simultaneous drawing and speaking tasks.
    Saltuklaroglu T; Teulings HL; Robbins M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Oct; 28(5):643-54. PubMed ID: 18986722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different lip asymmetry in adults who stutter: electromyographic evidence during speech and non-speech.
    Choo AL; Robb MP; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Huckabee ML; O'Beirne GA
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 20424470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-awareness and the subconscious effect of personal pronouns on word encoding: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study.
    Walla P; Greiner K; Duregger C; Deecke L; Thurner S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 17005211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering.
    Fox PT; Ingham RJ; Ingham JC; Hirsch TB; Downs JH; Martin C; Jerabek P; Glass T; Lancaster JL
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6587):158-61. PubMed ID: 8700204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Onset sequencing of selected lip muscles in stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Guitar B; Guitar C; Neilson P; O'Dwyer N; Andrews G
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 3352253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual word recognition: the first half second.
    Pammer K; Hansen PC; Kringelbach ML; Holliday I; Barnes G; Hillebrand A; Singh KD; Cornelissen PL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1819-25. PubMed ID: 15275938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severity of dysfluency correlates with basal ganglia activity in persistent developmental stuttering.
    Giraud AL; Neumann K; Bachoud-Levi AC; von Gudenberg AW; Euler HA; Lanfermann H; Preibisch C
    Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 17531310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-motor control and interhemispheric relations in recovered and persistent stuttering.
    Forster DC; Webster WG
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2001; 19(2):125-45. PubMed ID: 11530972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic and physiological reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Peters HF; Hulstijn W; Starkweather CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 2779210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological differences between stutterers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration.
    van Lieshout PH; Peters HF; Starkweather CW; Hulstijn W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motor cortex dynamics in visuomotor production of speech and non-speech mouth movements.
    Saarinen T; Laaksonen H; Parviainen T; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Feb; 16(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 15858159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of varying stimulus rate and duration on brain activity during reading.
    Price CJ; Moore CJ; Frackowiak RS
    Neuroimage; 1996 Feb; 3(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 9345474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracerebral ERD/ERS in voluntary movement and in cognitive visuomotor task.
    Rektor I; Sochůrková D; Bocková M
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():311-30. PubMed ID: 17071240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.