These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement. Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study. Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation]. Matschke RG HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporary Hearing Threshold Shift in Healthy Volunteers with Hearing Protection Caused by Acoustic Noise Exposure during 3-T Multisequence MR Neuroimaging. Jin C; Li H; Li X; Wang M; Liu C; Guo J; Yang J Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):602-608. PubMed ID: 28813235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences. Shellock FG; Morisoli SM; Ziarati M Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 8134603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noise and communication: a three-year update. Brammer AJ; Laroche C Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):281-6. PubMed ID: 23257578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner. Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing. Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow. Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine. Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-Based Occupational Hearing Screening I: Modeling the Effects of Real-World Noise Environments on the Likelihood of Effective Speech Communication. Soli SD; Giguère C; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS; Harkins K; Ruckstuhl M; Ramulu P; Meyers LS Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):436-448. PubMed ID: 29697497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]