These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15221450)

  • 1. Does haplotype diversity predict power for association mapping of disease susceptibility?
    Zhang W; Collins A; Morton NE
    Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 115(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15221450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples.
    Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2005 Oct; 6():51. PubMed ID: 16236175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and haplotype analyses, using dense SNP Maps, of 199 drug-related genes in 752 subjects: the analysis of the association between uncommon SNPs within haplotype blocks and the haplotypes constructed with haplotype-tagging SNPs.
    Kamatani N; Sekine A; Kitamoto T; Iida A; Saito S; Kogame A; Inoue E; Kawamoto M; Harigai M; Nakamura Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Aug; 75(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 15202072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms and association studies.
    Thompson D; Stram D; Goldgar D; Witte JS
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):48-55. PubMed ID: 14614238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests.
    Bader JS
    Pharmacogenomics; 2001 Feb; 2(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11258193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of single SNPs, haplotypes, and whole-genome LD maps on accuracy of association mapping.
    Maniatis N; Collins A; Morton NE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 17285621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional cloning by linkage disequilibrium.
    Maniatis N; Collins A; Gibson J; Zhang W; Tapper W; Morton NE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 May; 74(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 15048619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.
    Schulze TG; Zhang K; Chen YS; Akula N; Sun F; McMahon FJ
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Feb; 13(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 14681300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies.
    Zhang K; Qin ZS; Liu JS; Chen T; Waterman MS; Sun F
    Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 15078859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further investigation of linkage disequilibrium SNPs and their ability to identify associated susceptibility loci.
    North BV; Curtis D; Martin ER; Lai EH; Roses AD; Sham PC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 May; 68(Pt 3):240-8. PubMed ID: 15180704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of the association information captured by SNP tagging.
    Nothnagel M; Wollstein A; Krawczak M
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 17483594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
    Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A coalescent simulation of marker selection strategy for candidate gene association studies.
    Cole SM; Long JC
    Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet; 2008 Jan; 147B(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17722024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
    Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.