These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15221809)

  • 1. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of breast cancer.
    Yuen S; Yamada K; Kinosada Y; Matsushima S; Nakano Y; Goto M; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 20(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 15221809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
    Mastsushima S; Nishiofuku H; Iwata H; Era S; Inaba Y; Kinosada Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 18504747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign phyllodes tumors of the breast.
    Kinoshita T; Fukutomi T; Kubochi K
    Breast J; 2004; 10(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 15125750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A wide variety of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR appearances of breast cancer: pathologic correlation study.
    Onishi M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17683886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subtraction of in-phase and opposed-phase images in dynamic MR mammography.
    Reichenbach JR; Hopfe J; Rauscher A; Wurdinger S; Kaiser WA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 15834904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased ipsilateral whole breast vascularity as measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Quinn C; Rim A; Crowe J; Kim J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):576-9. PubMed ID: 16164924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of tumor blood perfusion assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with tumor blood supply assessed by invasive imaging.
    Graff BA; Benjaminsen IC; Brurberg KG; Ruud EB; Rofstad EK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 15723369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent component analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of breast carcinoma: a feasibility study.
    Koh TS; Thng CH; Ho JT; Tan PH; Rumpel H; Khoo JB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):271-7. PubMed ID: 18421682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
    Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
    Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using parametric contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study.
    Chou CP; Wu MT; Chang HT; Lo YS; Pan HB; Degani H; Furman-Haran E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):561-73. PubMed ID: 17434070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two different types of ring-like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer: correlation with the histopathologic findings.
    Kobayashi M; Kawashima H; Matsui O; Zen Y; Suzuki M; Inokuchi M; Noguchi M; Ohta T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1435-43. PubMed ID: 19025952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparative study of MRI manifestations and pathological changes in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with lipiodol].
    Liu R; Wang JH; Zhou KR; Yan FH; Yan ZP; Shen JZ; Tan YS; Cai Y
    Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 13(10):754-8. PubMed ID: 16248948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers.
    Tuncbilek N; Karakas HM; Okten OO
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15664283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the longitudinal tumor extent of bile duct cancer: value of adding gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging to unenhanced images and magnetic resonance cholangiography.
    Kim HJ; Lee JM; Kim SH; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi JY; Kim KH; Kim JY; Lee MW; Kim SJ; Choi BI
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 17538298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.