175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15222793)
1. Morphological evaluation of changes in velopharyngeal function following maxillary distraction in patients with repaired cleft palate during mixed dentition.
Satoh K; Nagata J; Shomura K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J; Shiba R
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Jul; 41(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 15222793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.
McComb RW; Marrinan EM; Nuss RC; Labrie RA; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 21783004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.
Ko EW; Figueroa AA; Guyette TW; Polley JW; Law WR
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Jul; 10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. PubMed ID: 10686880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with cleft lip and palate.
Scolozzi P; Herzog G; Jaques B
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 18812875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distraction of Le Fort II osteotomy by intraoral distractor: a case report.
Cheung LK; Lo J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 16631498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis--early results.
Chanchareonsook N; Whitehill TL; Samman N
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jan; 44(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 17214524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: a critical review.
Chanchareonsook N; Samman N; Whitehill TL
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Jul; 43(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 16854207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing children with cleft lip and palate.
Huang CS; Harikrishnan P; Liao YF; Ko EW; Liou EJ; Chen PK
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 May; 44(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 17477762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction osteogenesis in the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients.
Scolozzi P
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1199-214. PubMed ID: 18812842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
Guyette TW; Polley JW; Figueroa A; Smith BE
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 May; 38(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 11386427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis: report of 2 cases.
Alkan A; Baş B; Ozer M; Bayram M; Yüzbasioğlu E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 18083426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
Chua HD; Whitehill TL; Samman N; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 20413269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nasopharyngoscopic Analyses through Anterior Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis for Adolescent Patients With Cleft Palate.
Imai Y; Nakajo T; Nishimura K; Kanzaki H; Daimaruya T; Satoh A; Igarashi K; Tachi M
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):270-274. PubMed ID: 29077684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transantral distraction devices in correction of severe maxillary deformity in cleft patients.
Shokirov S; Wangerin K
Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21558788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy With Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study.
Wu Y; Wang X; Ma L; Li Z
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 25259778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New fixation method for maxillary distraction osteogenesis using locking attachments.
Suzuki EY; Buranastidporn B; Ishii M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1553-60. PubMed ID: 16982316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia.
Gateno J; Engel ER; Teichgraeber JF; Yamaji KE; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 15635571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.
Cheung LK; Chua HD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16154316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
