These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15224063)
21. Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments. Bishara SE; Bayati P; Zaher AR; Jakobsen JR Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 7802329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions. Janson G; Camardella LT; Araki JD; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Bailey LT; Esmailnejad A; Almeida MA Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8678349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping. Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols. Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of arch width changes following orthodontic treatment with and without extraction using three-dimensional models. Oz AA; Oz AZ; Yaziciooğlu S; Arici N; Ozer M; Arici S Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 May; 20(5):581-586. PubMed ID: 28513517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions. Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols. Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars. Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. To extract or not to extract: is that the right question? Labarrère H J Clin Orthod; 2004 Feb; 38(2):63-78; quiz 91-2. PubMed ID: 15004391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Three-dimension model analysis for physiological drift of the mandibular dentition after extraction of mandibular second premolars of Angle class II patients]. Wei S; Li J; Zhou YH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Feb; 45(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 23411525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Customized Lingual Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Bilateral Maxillary First Premolar Extraction: Case Report. Kong WD; Li SS; Feng Y; Cen WJ; Zhou ZZ; Huang LW Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2017 Spring; 28(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 29990403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in occlusal function after extraction of premolars: 2-year follow-up. Yoon W; Hwang S; Chung C; Kim KH Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):703-708. PubMed ID: 28485615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Palatal shape covariation in extraction versus nonextraction borderline patients: A geometric morphometric study. Papagiannis A; Sallmann R; Papageorgiou SN; Eliades T; Konstantonis D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 May; 163(5):e127-e136. PubMed ID: 36934057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion]. Li Q; Zheng Z; Bai D; Pang G Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Gianelly AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12532059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]