These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15224990)

  • 1. Should valve evaluation be undertaken in different populations from different countries?
    Antunes MJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15224990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for a correct method of evaluation of valve prosthesis performance. Laboratory assessment.
    Gerosa G; di Marco F; Casarotto D; Bottio T
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S1-3. PubMed ID: 15224988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Labcor-stented porcine heart valve prosthesis in laboratory testing in accordance with prEN 12006-1].
    Hüsgen P; Wirtz RJ; Köhler JC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():386-7. PubMed ID: 9859411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Animal trials for heart valve substitutes.
    Huysmans HA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S4-6. PubMed ID: 15224989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the minimal follow up period to be considered significant when evaluating a valve prosthesis model? Should 'actual' and 'actuarial' curves be considered always essential for any scientific presentation?
    Sala A; Mantovani V
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S18-9. PubMed ID: 15224993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation: statistical considerations and how to meet them in clinical practice.
    Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S11-3. PubMed ID: 15224991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quantifying the degeneration of bioprostheses with histologic and chemical methods].
    Valdor M; Grau M; Lo HB; Richter HA; Mittermayer C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():30-1. PubMed ID: 2078744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current and future issues in sensitisation testing.
    Eloy R; Charton-Picard F; Delubac C; Kergozien S
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Sep; 12(7):12-5. PubMed ID: 12938553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early changes in bioprosthetic heart valves following ventricular assist device implantation.
    Butany J; Leong SW; Rao V; Borger MA; David TE; Cunningham KS; Daniel L
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 117(1):e20-3. PubMed ID: 17254647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography].
    Saam T; Oberhoffer M; Rist C; Minaifar N; Vogt F; Reichart B; Becker C; Reiser M; Nikolaou K
    Rofo; 2008 Jun; 180(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 18504666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The changing spectrum of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure.
    Bottio T; Thiene G
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17218208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does valve design impact the maximum implantable bioprosthetic diameter? A prospective, multicenter observational study.
    David IB; Catinella F; Herskowitz K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):662-6; discussion 666. PubMed ID: 18095517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achilles' heel of stentless porcine valves.
    Thiene G; Valente M
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(5):257. PubMed ID: 17868875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pulstile flow hydrodynamic test and analysis of valve motion in vitro of the stentless mitral valve].
    Wang X; Cong GP; Hu YR
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Dec; 29(6):720-2. PubMed ID: 16114569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetic heart valves: Objective Performance Criteria versus randomized clinical trial.
    Grunkemeier GL; Jin R; Starr A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):776-80. PubMed ID: 16928482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel study of mechanical heart valve cavitation in a pressurized pulsatile duplicator.
    Wu C; Retta SM; Robinson RA; Herman BA; Grossman LW
    ASAIO J; 2009; 55(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 19701083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stent measurement and inspection.
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Oct; 14(8):39. PubMed ID: 14603719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms.
    Mohammadi S; Baillot R; Voisine P; Mathieu P; Dagenais F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 16872969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.