47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 152250)
1. [The efficiency of mammographic mass screening (author's transl)].
Richter B
Rofo; 1978 Oct; 129(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 152250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk- and cost-benefit analyses of breast screening programs derived from absorbed dose measurements in The Netherlands.
Zuur C; Broerse JJ
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3928229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment.
Mettler FA; Upton AC; Kelsey CA; Ashby RN; Rosenberg RD; Linver MN
Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):903-9. PubMed ID: 8608482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
Daly L
Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiogenic breast cancer effects of mammographic screening.
Gohagan JK; Darby WP; Spitznagel EL; Monsees BS; Tome AE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Jul; 77(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 3459927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
Tabár L; Dean PB
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life.
Mattsson A; Leitz W; Rutqvist LE
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 10638993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The supposed cancer risk from mammography. Opposition to the assertions (author's transl)].
Oeser H; Koeppe P; Rach K
Rofo; 1976 Dec; 125(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 137843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mass radiography via mammography in women with enhanced risk of cancer of the breast (author's transl)].
Fischedick O; Plum R
Rontgenblatter; 1979 May; 32(5):242-50. PubMed ID: 441652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk-benefit analysis for mass screening of breast cancer utilizing mammography as a screening test].
Iinuma TA; Tateno Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 49(9):1091-5. PubMed ID: 2587191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening. Benefit and risk for the first annual screening.
Moskowitz M; Keriakes J; Saenger EL; Pemmmaraju S; Kumar A; Tafel G
Radiology; 1976 Aug; 120(2):431-2. PubMed ID: 935499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Critical notes on risk calculations in mammography (author's transl)].
Würthner K
Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):318-22. PubMed ID: 675059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic screening: is the benefit worth the risk?
Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):318-20. PubMed ID: 16464841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The problem of lowering the age limit for breast cancer screening in women under the compulsory health insurance system (author's transl)].
Schwartz FW; Robra BP
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Feb; 42(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 6917808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications and guidelines for mammographic examinations.
Kalisher L; Schaffer D
Am J Surg; 1977 Mar; 133(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 848662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Benefit-risk analysis for mass screening of stomach cancer in Japan. II. Genentic risk and cost of mass screening (author's transl)].
Iinuma TA; Tateno Y; Umegaki Y; Hashizume T; Kitabatake T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1978 Jul; 38(7):625-32. PubMed ID: 704295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value versus risk judgements in diagnostic radiology. Basic and practical considerations (author's transl)].
Rausch L
Rofo; 1976 Feb; 124(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 131071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On "conservative" estimates of radiation hazards.
Swartz HM
Radiology; 1978 Jan; 126(1):267-8. PubMed ID: 619428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
