358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15225001)
1. The experience with porcine bioprostheses at Padua University.
Gerosa G; Rizzoli G; Di Marco F; Bottio T; Thiene G; Casarotto D
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 15225001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-term results after Epic xenograft implantation for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement.
Lehmann S; Walther T; Leontjev S; Kempfert J; Rastan A; Garbade J; Borger MA; Falk V; Mohr FW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):641-8; discussion 648. PubMed ID: 18095514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpreting a 20-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Suyker WJ; Leicher FG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1354-5. PubMed ID: 20412969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple valve surgery with beating heart technique.
Ricci M; Macedo FI; Suarez MR; Brown M; Alba J; Salerno TA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 19161773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.
Ennker J; Dalladaku F; Rosendahl U; Ennker IC; Mauser M; Florath I
J Card Surg; 2006; 21(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16846417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthesis-related complications: first-year annual rates.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Anderson WN; Chambers JB; Gams JP; Dowd CM;
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 12479275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Morphological aspects of thrombosis of porcine valvular prostheses].
Thiene G; Panizzon G; Milano A; Stefani G; Bortolotti U; Gallucci V
Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1980; 25(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 7236437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Talwar S; Mathur A; Choudhary SK; Singh R; Kumar AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Oct; 84(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 17888973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mid-term follow up of triple valve surgery in a western community: predictors of survival.
Hermans H; Tjahjono M; Faes D; Belmans A; Meuris B; Herijgers P; Flameng W; Herregods MC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Sep; 19(5):644-51; discussion 652. PubMed ID: 21053745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Infectious endocarditis on porcine valvular prostheses: clinical and pathological aspects].
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Panizzon G; Stefani G; Thiene G; Gallucci V
Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1980; 25(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 7236438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The fate of Hancock II porcine valve recipients 25 years after implant.
Valfrè C; Ius P; Minniti G; Salvador L; Bottio T; Cesari F; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Aug; 38(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20194029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A study on prosthetic valves with reference to anticoagulation-related complications].
Sakashita I; Otani S; Hayashi J; Eguchi S
Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1981; 1(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 7052581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
