BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15226646)

  • 21. Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans.
    Dauer LT; Casciotta KA; Erdi YE; Rothenberg LN
    BMC Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 7():5. PubMed ID: 17367529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effective doses in children: association with common complex imaging techniques used during interventional radiology procedures.
    Lai P; McNeil SM; Gordon CL; Connolly BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 25415713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Organ and effective doses in newborns and infants undergoing voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG): a comparison of stylized and tomographic phantoms.
    Pazik FD; Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):294-306. PubMed ID: 17278515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
    Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perfusion CT of the Brain and Liver and of Lung Tumors: Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Patient Dose Estimation for Examinations With a Cone-Beam 320-MDCT Scanner.
    Cros M; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Salvadó M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 26700344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification.
    Jurik AG; Jensen LC; Hansen J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 8915269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.
    Eder H
    Rofo; 2023 Mar; 195(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 36796379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Organ equivalent doses of patients undergoing chest computed tomography: measurements with TL dosimeters in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Gonzaga NB; Mourão AP; Magalhães MJ; da Silva TA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt C():242-4. PubMed ID: 23972586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of organ doses in adult and paediatric CT examinations based on Monte Carlo simulations and in-phantom dosimetry.
    Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Takahashi K; Obara S; Akahane K; Satake M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):166-71. PubMed ID: 25848103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective dose and radiation risk under 640-slice abdominal computed tomography examination without contrast medium injection.
    Lu MY; Ting CY; Jao JC
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(4):657-666. PubMed ID: 35367977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [About Gonad Protection Based on Ovarian Position in Hip Plain Radiography].
    Shibata J; Mori H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 35046222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Morkunas G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15933102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. I. Radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom.
    Takahashi F; Sato K; Endo A; Ono K; Yoshitake T; Hasegawa T; Katsunuma Y; Ban N; Kai M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21493598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of organ dosimetry methods and effective dose calculation methods for paediatric CT.
    Brady Z; Cain TM; Johnston PN
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Jun; 35(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 22492218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. DEVELOPMENT OF A SET OF MESH-BASED AND AGE-DEPENDENT CHINESE PHANTOMS AND APPLICATION FOR CT DOSE CALCULATIONS.
    Pi Y; Liu T; Xu XG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):370-382. PubMed ID: 29340629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implications in medical imaging of the new ICRP thresholds for tissue reactions.
    Vañó E; Miller DL; Dauer L
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):118-28. PubMed ID: 25816265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.