These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15228202)

  • 1. A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Speight PM
    Community Dent Health; 2004 Jun; 21(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15228202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
    Doust JA; Pietrzak E; Sanders S; Glasziou PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 15845330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Searching for primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews].
    Ishida H
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jul; 51(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 12924255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness.
    Brettle AJ; Long AF
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Oct; 89(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 11837257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews.
    Kastner M; Straus SE; McKibbon KA; Goldsmith CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 18722088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.
    Colthart I; Bagnall G; Evans A; Allbutt H; Haig A; Illing J; McKinstry B
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 18464136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records.
    Edwards P; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Roberts I; Wentz R
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1635-40. PubMed ID: 12111924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surveying the traumatic stress literature: the effective use of bibliographic databases in preparing reviews and meta-analyses.
    Lerner F; Hamblen JL
    J Trauma Stress; 2010 Dec; 23(6):819-22. PubMed ID: 20979218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health economic evaluations: how to find them.
    Alton V; Eckerlund I; Norlund A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16984686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of test performance in screening for oral cancer and precancer.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Palmer S; Speight PM
    Oral Oncol; 2004 Mar; 40(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 14747057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews.
    Maggio LA; Tannery NH; Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 21694568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.