These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15228202)

  • 21. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.
    Egger M; Juni P; Bartlett C; Holenstein F; Sterne J
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(1):1-76. PubMed ID: 12583822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Bibliographic research of efficiency tests: analysis of the validity of the meta-database].
    Galbiati G; Casati M
    Prof Inferm; 2010; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 20470454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A systematic review of measures of effectiveness in screening for oral cancer and precancer.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Palmer S; Speight PM
    Oral Oncol; 2006 Jul; 42(6):551-60. PubMed ID: 16815505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nonlinear behavior of search strategies for identifying relevant orthodontic articles.
    Stamm T; Hohoff A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):316-8. PubMed ID: 15264640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3454-6. PubMed ID: 11037585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency.
    Chapman AL; Morgan LC; Gartlehner G
    Health Info Libr J; 2010 Mar; 27(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20402801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine.
    Lane D; Dykeman J; Ferri M; Goldsmith CH; Stelfox HT
    J Crit Care; 2013 Aug; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 23312123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impact of meta-analysis in clinical practice: the example of psychiatry].
    Ceballos C; García-Campayo J; Artal A; Valdizán JR
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2001; 29(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 11602084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Cooke A; Smith D; Booth A
    Qual Health Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 22829486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic search offers a sound evidence base.
    Holmes S
    Nurs Times; 1996 Jan 24-30; 92(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 8710655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis of measures of performance reported in oral cancer and precancer screening studies.
    Moles DR; Downer MC; Speight PM
    Br Dent J; 2002 Mar; 192(6):340-4; discussion 332. PubMed ID: 15552072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Boosting qualifies capture-recapture methods for estimating the comprehensiveness of literature searches for systematic reviews.
    Rücker G; Reiser V; Motschall E; Binder H; Meerpohl JJ; Antes G; Schumacher M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1364-72. PubMed ID: 21684116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A systematic evaluation of application of the web-based cancer database].
    Huang T; Liu J; Li Y; Zhang R
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 30(5):946-51. PubMed ID: 24459949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of narrative text for injury surveillance research: a systematic review.
    McKenzie K; Scott DA; Campbell MA; McClure RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 20159054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Key points for the analysis... of a meta-analysis].
    Peigné M; Catteau-Jonard S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Mar; 38(3):232-3. PubMed ID: 20223694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews.
    Rice M; Ali MU; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Kenny M; Raina P; Sherifali D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():148-153. PubMed ID: 28625563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Meta-analysis: a structured bibliographic protocol].
    Buntinx F; Buelens F
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1992; 47(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 1480793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.