109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15228851)
1. Ultrasound differentiation of benign versus malignant solid breast masses.
Murad M; Bari V
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Mar; 14(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 15228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraductal mass on breast ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Kim SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):932-7. PubMed ID: 23521472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.
Wolfson S; Heller SL; Gao Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 34549605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
Stavros AT; Thickman D; Rapp CL; Dennis MA; Parker SH; Sisney GA
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 7784555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses.
Kim KG; Cho SW; Min SJ; Kim JH; Min BG; Bae KT
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 15691726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffractive ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses: preliminary results.
Park BK; Moon WK; Cha JH; Cho N; Kim SM; Noh DY; Park IA; Kim SH; Im JG
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 15973142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic and sonographic findings of primary breast lymphoma.
Lyou CY; Yang SK; Choe DH; Lee BH; Kim KH
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 17599616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes.
Chen SC; Cheung YC; Su CH; Chen MF; Hwang TL; Hsueh S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14770402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
Skaane P; Engedal K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound in the assessment of the palpable breast mass.
Hasni H; Meah FA; Norlia A; Sharifah NA; Zulfiqar A
Med J Malaysia; 2004 Oct; 59(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 15779581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign circumscribed breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic appearance.
Schepps B; Scola FH; Frates RE
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Sep; 21(3):519-37. PubMed ID: 7816411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features.
Paulinelli RR; Freitas-Júnior R; Moreira MA; Moraes VA; Bernardes-Júnior JR; Vidal Cda S; Ruiz AN; Lucato MT
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 15840795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Butler R; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Schilling KJ; Young CA; Dogan BE; Neuschler EI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 30106610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiating fat necrosis from recurrent malignancy in fat-grafted breasts: an imaging classification system to guide management.
Parikh RP; Doren EL; Mooney B; Sun WV; Laronga C; Smith PD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):761-772. PubMed ID: 23018689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
