183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15229573)
1. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service.
Butler D
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The joy of discovery.
de Duve C
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Making an impact.
Wu R
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific research and the human condition.
Perez Velazquez JL
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
Fenning TM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer reviews: in praise of referees.
Altschuler EL
Nature; 2011 May; 473(7348):452. PubMed ID: 21614062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standards for papers on cloning.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The family naturalist.
Agre P
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S11. PubMed ID: 20944611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What's next for Registered Reports?
Chambers C
Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Academics are teachers and colleagues too.
Greif KF
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoughtful peer review is worth the time it takes.
Michalet X
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7046):1160. PubMed ID: 15988495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
Korngreen A
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
