These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15229573)
21. Reviewing should be shown in publication list. Clausen T; Nielsen OB Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review could be improved by market forces. Jaffe K Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality. Gibson TA Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. It's easier to patent plants than to publish research. Lavania UC Nature; 2006 Aug; 442(7104):744. PubMed ID: 16915263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The secrets of success. Smaglik P Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Research methods: Know when your numbers are significant. Vaux DL Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7428):180-1. PubMed ID: 23235861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Animal research. Reliability of protocol reviews for animal research. Plous S; Herzog H Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5530):608-9. PubMed ID: 11474086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Public health research and the need for methodological rigour. Daly J; Robinson P Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Oct; 32(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 18959539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Discourse among referees and editors would help. Lahiri DK Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact factor and its role in academic promotion. Adler KB Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 41(2):127. PubMed ID: 19620407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pressure also leads to worthless publications. de Carvalho LB Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data. Nicholson JK Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Research barometer: how is research activity monitored and how is it compared?]. Djurhuus JC Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 12599793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat. Bentley P Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction. Marris E Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Should journals police scientific fraud? Marris E Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]