These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15230330)

  • 21. Dietary Toxicity Thresholds and Ecological Risks for Birds and Mammals Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Korsman JC; Schipper AM; Hendriks AJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(19):10644-10652. PubMed ID: 27579512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrepancies in the acute versus chronic toxicity of compounds with a designated narcotic mechanism.
    Dom N; Penninck M; Knapen D; Blust R
    Chemosphere; 2012 May; 87(7):742-9. PubMed ID: 22284979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of PNEC values: extrapolation from Microtox, algae, daphnid, and fish data to HC5.
    Garay V; Roman G; Isnard P
    Chemosphere; 2000 Feb; 40(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 10665416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extrapolation of available acute and chronic toxicity test data to population-level effects for ecological risk management of chemicals.
    Lin BL; Meng Y
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 Jul; 28(7):1557-66. PubMed ID: 19239318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: II. Pyrethroid insecticides.
    Fojut TL; Palumbo AJ; Tjeerdema RS
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012; 216():51-103. PubMed ID: 22298113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The power of size. 1. Rate constants and equilibrium ratios for accumulation of organic substances related to octanol-water partition ratio and species weight.
    Hendriks AJ; van der Linde A; Cornelissen G; Sijm DT
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Jul; 20(7):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11434281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
    Sorgog K; Kamo M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acute toxicity value extrapolation with fish and aquatic invertebrates.
    Buckler DR; Mayer FL; Ellersieck MR; Asfaw A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 49(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 16205993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets.
    Pennington DW
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2003 Oct; 56(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 12927555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aquatic risk assessment of alcohol ethoxylates in North America and Europe.
    Belanger SE; Dorn PB; Toy R; Boeije G; Marshall SJ; Wind T; Van Compernolle R; Zeller D
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 May; 64(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 16439022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evaluation of the equilibrium partitioning method using sensitivity distributions of species in water and soil.
    van Beelen P; Verbruggen EM; Peijnenburg WJ
    Chemosphere; 2003 Aug; 52(7):1153-62. PubMed ID: 12820996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing acute and chronic copper risks to freshwater aquatic life using species sensitivity distributions for different taxonomic groups.
    Brix KV; DeForest DK; Adams WJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Aug; 20(8):1846-56. PubMed ID: 11491571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors.
    Kwok KW; Leung KM; Lui GS; Chu SV; Lam PK; Morritt D; Maltby L; Brock TC; Van den Brink PJ; Warne MS; Crane M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 17283595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment.
    Raimondo S; Vivian DN; Delos C; Barron MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2599-607. PubMed ID: 18699704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
    Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal.
    Van Sprang PA; Verdonck FA; Van Assche F; Regoli L; De Schamphelaere KA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(20):5373-91. PubMed ID: 19631966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of the soil hazardous concentration of methylparaben using a species sensitivity approach.
    Kim D; Cui R; Moon J; Kwak JI; Kim SW; Kim D; An YJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt A):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 30373031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: I. Organophosphate insecticides.
    Palumbo AJ; Tenbrook PL; Fojut TL; Faria IR; Tjeerdema RS
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012; 216():1-49. PubMed ID: 22298112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3447-52. PubMed ID: 18522132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.