These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15231231)

  • 21. Reparametrization-based estimation of genetic parameters in multi-trait animal model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation.
    Mathew B; Holand AM; Koistinen P; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Feb; 129(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 26582509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in multiple line crosses.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genetica; 2002 Apr; 114(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 12206360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of using approximate gametic variance covariance matrices on marker assisted selection by BLUP.
    Totir LR; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Fernández SA; Guldbrandtsen B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 14713408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian inference on major loci in related multigeneration selection lines of laying hens.
    Hagger C; Janss LL; Kadarmideen HN; Stranzinger G
    Poult Sci; 2004 Dec; 83(12):1932-9. PubMed ID: 15615002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JW; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 27491547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci under complicated mating designs.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genetics; 2001 Apr; 157(4):1759-71. PubMed ID: 11290729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A sampling algorithm for segregation analysis.
    Tier B; Henshall J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(6):587-603. PubMed ID: 11742631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variance of gametic diversity and its application in selection programs.
    Santos DJA; Cole JB; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM; Tonhati H; Ma L
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jun; 102(6):5279-5294. PubMed ID: 30981488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations.
    Abney M; McPeek MS; Ober C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):629-50. PubMed ID: 10677322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating Heritability from Nuclear Family and Pedigree Data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():195-210. PubMed ID: 28980247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finding starting points for Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of genetic data from large and complex pedigrees.
    Luo Y; Lin S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 12813723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Dissection of Expression Quantitative Trait Locus Hotspots.
    Tian J; Keller MP; Broman AT; Kendziorski C; Yandell BS; Attie AD; Broman KW
    Genetics; 2016 Apr; 202(4):1563-74. PubMed ID: 26837753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population.
    de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JF; E Silva FF; de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; Resende MF
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Jul; 117(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27118156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finding noncommunicating sets for Markov chain Monte Carlo estimations on pedigrees.
    Lin S; Thompson E; Wijsman E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Apr; 54(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 8128968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.