These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15231233)

  • 1. Response to mass selection when the genotype by environment interaction is modelled as a linear reaction norm.
    Kolmodin R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(4):435-54. PubMed ID: 15231233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotype x environment interactions and genetic parameters for fecal egg count and production traits of Merino sheep.
    Pollott GE; Greeff JC
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Oct; 82(10):2840-51. PubMed ID: 15484934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintenance of genetic variation in phenotypic plasticity: the role of environmental variation.
    de Jong G; Gavrilets S
    Genet Res; 2000 Dec; 76(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 11204976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When three traits make a line: evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation through linear reaction norms in stochastic environments.
    Ergon T; Ergon R
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Mar; 30(3):486-500. PubMed ID: 27862551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction norm model with unknown environmental covariate to analyze heterosis by environment interaction.
    Su G; Madsen P; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2204-13. PubMed ID: 19389979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple trait breeding programs with genotype-by-environment interactions based on reaction norms, with application to genetic improvement of disease resilience.
    Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Dec; 53(1):93. PubMed ID: 34903174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of breeding values and selection responses with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1895-910. PubMed ID: 17277375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Tempelman RJ; Lopes PS; Aguilar I; Silva FF; Cardoso FF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():3. PubMed ID: 26767704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian estimation of direct and correlated responses to selection on linear or ratio expressions of feed efficiency in pigs.
    Shirali M; Varley PF; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):33. PubMed ID: 29925306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of milk production traits in early lactation using a reaction norm model with unknown covariates.
    Shariati MM; Su G; Madsen P; Sorensen D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5759-66. PubMed ID: 18024770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.
    Oliveira DP; Lourenco DAL; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Santos DJA; de Araújo Neto FR; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Baldi F; Carvalheiro R; de Camargo GMF; Albuquerque LG; Tonhati H
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 96(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29365164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.
    Liu PY; Zhu J; Yan L
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of data structure on the estimation of covariance functions to describe genotype by environment interactions in a reaction norm model.
    Calus MP; Bijma P; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(5):489-507. PubMed ID: 15339629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grain of environment explains variation in the strength of genotype × environment interaction.
    Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1897-901. PubMed ID: 22805149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.