These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523244)

  • 1. Rewarding effectiveness of caudal MFB stimulation is unaltered following DMH lesions.
    Waraczynski M; Conover K; Shizgal P
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 1523244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Destruction of the medial forebrain bundle caudal to the site of stimulation reduces rewarding efficacy but destruction rostrally does not.
    Gallistel CR; Leon M; Lim BT; Sim JC; Waraczynski M
    Behav Neurosci; 1996 Aug; 110(4):766-90. PubMed ID: 8864268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-stimulation of the MFB following parabrachial lesions.
    Waraczynski M; Shizgal P
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Sep; 58(3):559-66. PubMed ID: 8587965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attenuation of medical forebrain bundle reward by anterior lateral hypothalamic lesions.
    Murray B; Shizgal P
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Feb; 75(1-2):33-47. PubMed ID: 8800658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midbrain periaqueductal lesions do not degrade medial forebrain bundle stimulation reward.
    Waraczynski M; Carlton E; Perkins M
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 95(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 9806437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain on MFB self-stimulation.
    Arvanitogiannis A; Waraczynski M; Shizgal P
    Physiol Behav; 1996; 59(4-5):795-806. PubMed ID: 8778869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lesions and inactivation implicate dorsolateral hindbrain in MFB self-stimulation.
    Acheson A; Waraczynski M; Perkins M
    Physiol Behav; 2000 Oct 1-15; 71(1-2):159-71. PubMed ID: 11134698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Light and electron microscopic studies on the medial forebrain bundle in rat: III. Degenerated nerve elements in the medial hypothalamic nuclei following surgical transections of the medial forebrain bundle.
    van Cuc H; Léránth C; Palkovits M
    Brain Res Bull; 1980; 5(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 6965877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of feeding and rewarding brain stimulation on lateral hypothalamic unit activity in freely moving rats.
    Sasaki K; Ono T; Muramoto K; Nishino H; Fukuda M
    Brain Res; 1984 Nov; 322(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6150748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporary inactivation of the retrorubral fields decreases the rewarding effect of medial forebrain bundle stimulation.
    Waraczynski M; Perkins M
    Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 885(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 11102569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial Forebrain Bundle Deep Brain Stimulation has Symptom-specific Anti-depressant Effects in Rats and as Opposed to Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Stimulation Interacts With the Reward System.
    Edemann-Callesen H; Voget M; Empl L; Vogel M; Wieske F; Rummel J; Heinz A; Mathé AA; Hadar R; Winter C
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 25819024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiological measures of conduction velocity and refractory period for putative reward-relevant MFB axons arising in the rostral MFB.
    Murray B; Shizgal P
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Mar; 59(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 8700942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forebrain origins and terminations of the medial forebrain bundle metabolically activated by rewarding stimulation or by reward-blocking doses of pimozide.
    Gallistel CR; Gomita Y; Yadin E; Campbell KA
    J Neurosci; 1985 May; 5(5):1246-61. PubMed ID: 3873523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural substrates for the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of medial forebrain bundle stimulation have partially discrepant frequency responses.
    Cossette MP; Conover K; Shizgal P
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 297():345-58. PubMed ID: 26477378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure of amygdaloid lesions to increase the threshold for self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and ventral tegmental area.
    Waraczynski M; Ton MN; Shizgal P
    Behav Brain Res; 1990 Nov; 40(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2285475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of knife-cut lesions of the medial forebrain bundle in self-stimulating rats.
    Janas JD; Stellar JR
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Dec; 101(6):832-45. PubMed ID: 3501293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesions of midline midbrain structures leave medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation intact.
    Waraczynski M; Perkins M; Acheson A
    Behav Brain Res; 1999 Sep; 103(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 10513585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ventrolateral medullary neurons projecting to the medial preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area through the medial forebrain bundle: an electrophysiological study in the rat.
    Kaba H; Saito H; Otsuka K; Seto K
    Exp Brain Res; 1986; 63(2):369-74. PubMed ID: 3489639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basal forebrain knife cuts and medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation.
    Waraczynski MA
    Brain Res; 1988 Jan; 438(1-2):8-22. PubMed ID: 3257893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interhemispheric involvement of the anterior cortical nuclei of the amygdala in rewarding brain stimulation.
    Miguelez M; Kentner AC; Deslauriers K; Parkinson M; Fouriezos G; Bielajew C
    Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 1003(1-2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15019573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.