96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523308)
1. Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US.
Innocenti P; Pulli F; Savino L; Nicolucci A; Pandimiglio A; Menchi I; Massi G
Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 1523308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use of transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of early-stage cervical cancer].
Fischerová D; Cibula D; Stenhová H; Vondrichová H; Zikán M; Freitag P; Sláma J; Pavlsta D; Pinkavová I; Dundr P
Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Oct; 74(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 20063834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Stage I and II cervical carcinoma. Study with magnetic resonance and transrectal echography].
Tipaldi L; Squillaci E; Cecconi L; Lombardi A; Marsella A; Vincenzoni C; Crecco M; Squillaci S
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 2057594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer.
Fischerova D; Cibula D; Stenhova H; Vondrichova H; Calda P; Zikan M; Freitag P; Slama J; Dundr P; Belacek J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 17892456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional transvaginal tomographic ultrasound imaging for cervical cancer staging.
Han XS; Ning CP; Sun LT; Li XY; Peng YQ; Dang MZ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2303-9. PubMed ID: 26070421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimodal endocavitary ultrasound versus MRI and clinical findings in pre- and post-treatment advanced cervical cancer. Preliminary report.
Csutak C; Badea R; Bolboaca SD; Ordeanu C; Nagy VM; Fekete Z; Chiorean L; Dudea SM
Med Ultrason; 2016 Mar; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26962558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hematometra in patients with cervical cancer--its CT presentation and clinical significance].
Hsu SM; Pan HB; Kan YY; Chang JM; Yang CF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Feb; 51(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 8385551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Transabdominal and Transrectal Ultrasound in Staging Cervical Cancer: A Reliability Study.
Zhang J; Xiang JD; Jia C; Du LF; Li F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 49(10):2283-2290. PubMed ID: 37495499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Imaging of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Soyer P; Michel G; Masselot J
J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 71(12):681-9. PubMed ID: 2290148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB cervical cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
Lin Y; Chen Z; Kuang F; Li H; Zhong Q; Ma M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 24270123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
