205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15233123)
1. Criminal DNA databank statutes and medical research.
Bressler DD
Jurimetrics; 2002; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 15233123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
Tracy PE; Morgan V
J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool?
Hibbert M
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
Kimel CW
Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
Cavoli JG
Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: information or invasion?
Might C
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2001; 26(2):773-95. PubMed ID: 12741386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
Dash JF
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expanding databases, declining liberties.
Simoncelli T; Wallace H
Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):3-8, 18. PubMed ID: 16789300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Donnan S
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
Scherer RC
Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases.
Williams R; Johnson P
New Genet Soc; 2004 Aug; 23(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 15460615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. F.B.I. set to open its DNA database for fighting crime: some fear for privacy.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Oct; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. set to begin a vast expansion of DNA sampling; big effect on immigrants; law to cover most people detained or arrested by federal agents.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2007 Feb; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 17315302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapists' obligations to report their patients' criminal acts.
Appelbaum PS; Meisel A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 3533183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
Parfett J
Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
Rosen C
New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector.
Lakra R; Dimitriadis F
Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system.
Kadash K; Kozlowski BE; Biega LA; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 15317179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
