BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523333)

  • 1. Radiography of the lumbosacral spine: characteristics of examinations performed in hospitals and other facilities.
    Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Slayton RJ; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1523333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations.
    Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 2217766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends survey of abdomen and lumbosacral spine radiography.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 15220497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of abnormal lumbosacral spine radiographs. A test comparing students, clinicians, radiology residents, and radiologists in medicine and chiropractic.
    Taylor JA; Clopton P; Bosch E; Miller KA; Marcelis S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(10):1147-53; discussion 1154. PubMed ID: 7638657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists.
    de Zoete A; Assendelft WJ; Algra PR; Oberman WR; Vanderschueren GM; Bezemer PD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(17):1926-33; discussion 1933. PubMed ID: 12221360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lowering patient dose on single-phase X-ray units.
    Fung K
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):159-64; quiz 165-6. PubMed ID: 7708914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of a nationwide survey of chest radiography: comparison with results of a previous study.
    Kaczmarek RV; Conway BJ; Slayton RO; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):891-6. PubMed ID: 10831717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Entrance surface dose and image quality: comparison of adult chest and abdominal X-ray examinations in general practitioner clinics, public and private hospitals in Malaysia.
    Hambali AS; Ng KH; Abdullah BJ; Wang HB; Jamal N; Spelic DC; Suleiman OH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jan; 133(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chiropractic radiologists: a survey of chiropractors' attitudes and patterns of use.
    Harger BL; Taylor JA; Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Jun; 20(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 9200045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation on patient dose in screen-film diagnostic radiology in Lhasa City, Xizang Autonomous Region, China.
    Du X
    Front Med; 2013 Dec; 7(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 24142378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations.
    Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1523318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient and staff doses in radiology and cardiology in Estonia.
    Filippova I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):59-61. PubMed ID: 16461509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential.
    Martin CJ; Darragh CL; McKenzie GA; Bayliss AP
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Mar; 66(783):228-33. PubMed ID: 8472116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient doses from chest radiography in Victoria.
    Cardillo I; Boal TJ; Einsiedel PF
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 9262028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled x-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine.
    Conway BJ; Duff JE; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ; Rothenberg LN; Fleischman RC
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):448-53. PubMed ID: 2385202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring of the medical radiological exposures of the population of the Emilia-Romagna Region.
    Compagnone G; Angelini P; Pagan L
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):469-80. PubMed ID: 16683092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost accounting of radiological examinations. Cost analysis of radiological examinations of intermediate referral hospitals and general practice.
    Lääperi AL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 407():1-54. PubMed ID: 8804226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.