These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523333)

  • 41. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
    Morrison GD; Underwood AC
    Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Patient dosimetry activities in the United States: the nationwide evaluation of X-ray trends (NEXT) and tissue dose handbooks.
    Suleiman OH; Stern SH; Spelic DC
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):247-59. PubMed ID: 10028641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.
    Brennan PC; Johnston D
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Mar; 75(891):243-8. PubMed ID: 11932218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Chiropractic in The Netherlands: a survey of Dutch chiropractors.
    Assendelft WJ; Pfeifle CE; Bouter LM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995; 18(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7790791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Basic characteristics of radiology groups in the United States: results of a 1991-1992 census.
    Bansal S; Sunshine J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 8310907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
    Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 19720356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Plain film radiology in chiropractic.
    Klemp DD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jun; 15(5):331-2. PubMed ID: 1613414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of two new compensating filters on patient exposure in chiropractic full spine radiography.
    Merkin JJ; Sportelli L
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1982 Mar; 5(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7077189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. X-ray field collimation in diagnostic radiology.
    Rogers KD; Matthews IP
    Radiography; 1986; 52(604):161-6. PubMed ID: 3809423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Entrance surface and ovarian doses in hysterosalpingography.
    Fife IA; Wilson DJ; Lewis CA
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):860-3. PubMed ID: 7953227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hospital activities of radiology groups in the United States: results of a 1992 ACR survey.
    Bansal S; Sunshine JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):453-65. PubMed ID: 7618576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of restricting the indications for lumbosacral spine radiography in patients with acute back symptoms.
    Baker SR; Rabin A; Lantos G; Gallagher EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Sep; 149(3):535-8. PubMed ID: 2956831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Application of lead-acrylic compensating filters in chiropractic full spine radiography: a technical report.
    Buehler MT; Hrejsa AF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1985 Sep; 8(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 4056627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
    Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Essay of establishing dynamic standards for the lumbosacral spine; roentgenographic findings in the investigation of dynamics of the lumbosacral spine in normal subjects].
    JIROUT J
    Cesk Neurol; 1959 May; 22(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 13663094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology.
    Martin CJ; Farquhar B; Stockdale E; MacDonald S
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):864-71. PubMed ID: 7953228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relative efficacy for radiation reducing methods in scoliotic patients.
    Aikenhead J; Triano J; Baker J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Aug; 12(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 2769090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.