BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15233664)

  • 21. Assessment of the effect of respiration on the esophageal variceal blood flow using transesophageal real-time two-dimensional Doppler echography.
    Sukigara M; Ohata M; Komazaki T; Omoto R
    Hepatology; 1988; 8(3):663-7. PubMed ID: 3286460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Esophageal and intrapleural pressures in the healthy conscious pony.
    Derksen FJ; Robinson NE
    Am J Vet Res; 1980 Nov; 41(11):1756-61. PubMed ID: 7212405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The current science of gastric banding: an overview of pressure-volume theory in band adjustments.
    Fried M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3 Suppl):S14-21. PubMed ID: 18501311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Accuracy of pressure measurements obtained with a new rectal balloon catheter].
    Le Normand L; Glemain P; Cordonnier JP; Brunel P; Karam G; Boullanger P; Buzelin JM
    Prog Urol; 2001 Feb; 11(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 11296633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of intermittent and continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring using an in vitro model.
    McBeth PB; Zengerink I; Zygun D; Ranson K; Anderson I; Lall RN; Kirkpatrick AW
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Mar; 62(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18261075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of an Endoscopic Fibre-Optic Pressure Sensor for Noninvasive Measurement of Variceal Pressure.
    Sun B; Kong DR; Li SW; Yu DF; Wang GJ; Yu FF; Wu Q; Xu JM
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():1893474. PubMed ID: 27314010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of a modified piezoresistive technique and a water-capsule technique for direct and continuous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model.
    Schachtrupp A; Henzler D; Orfao S; Schaefer W; Schwab R; Becker P; Schumpelick V
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 16505660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Review article: the relevance of portal pressure and other risk factors in acute gastro-oesophageal variceal bleeding.
    Dell'era A; Bosch J
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Sep; 20 Suppl 3():8-15; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 15335392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new method to measure intraosseous pressures.
    McDermott AG; Yabsley RH; Leahey JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jul; (208):25-7. PubMed ID: 3720132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurements Obtained From Esophageal Balloon Catheters Are Affected by the Esophageal Balloon Filling Volume in Children With ARDS.
    Hotz JC; Sodetani CT; Van Steenbergen J; Khemani RG; Deakers TW; Newth CJ
    Respir Care; 2018 Feb; 63(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 29089460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reevaluation of the balloon in gastrointestinal manometry.
    Wilkes PR; Hoskin RW; Semlacher EA; MacCannell KL; Tyberg JV
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Sep; 72(9):979-84. PubMed ID: 7842396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel model used to compare water-perfused and solid-state anorectal manometry.
    Florisson JM; Coolen JC; Bissett IP; Plank LD; Parry BR; Menzi E; Merrie AE
    Tech Coloproctol; 2006 Mar; 10(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 16528488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraluminal esophageal manometry: an analysis of variables affecting recording fidelity of peristaltic pressures.
    Stef JJ; Dodds WJ; Hogan WJ; Linehan JH; Stewart ET
    Gastroenterology; 1974 Aug; 67(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 4847702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of variceal pressure and its clinical implications.
    Nevens F; Fevery J
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1994; 207():6-10. PubMed ID: 7701268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Common cavity pressure during gastroesophageal reflux: reassessment using simultaneous pressure, impedance, and ultrasound imaging.
    Tipnis NA; Liu J; Puckett JL; Mittal RK
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2006 Jun; 290(6):G1149-56. PubMed ID: 16439471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C.
    Cotte UV; Faltenbacher VH; von Willich W; Bogner JR
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters.
    MacAskill W; Hoffman B; Johnson MA; Sharpe GR; Mills DE
    Physiol Rep; 2021 Apr; 9(8):e14831. PubMed ID: 33938126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Static and dynamic components of esophageal and central venous pressure during intra-abdominal hypertension.
    Valenza F; Chevallard G; Porro GA; Gattinoni L
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jun; 35(6):1575-81. PubMed ID: 17452925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring intravariceal pressure.
    Tandon RK; Saikia N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):414-6. PubMed ID: 19699976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.