102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15234632)
1. Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Fraser CG
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15234632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria.
Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL
Clin Chem; 1994 Oct; 40(10):1909-14. PubMed ID: 7923771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the quality of clinical guidelines. Linking decisions to medical evidence.
Djulbegovic B; Hadley T
Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Nov; 12(11A):310-4. PubMed ID: 10028514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality specifications for biochemical markers of myocardial injury.
Zaninotto M; Mion M; Altinier S; Forni M; Plebani M
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15234637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The truth about quality: medical usefulness and analytical reliability of laboratory tests.
Westgard JO; Darcy T
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15234630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems for clinical chemistry.
Fraser CG; Petersen PH; Ricos C; Haeckel R
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 May; 30(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 1627730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters.
Castilla JA; Alvarez C; Aguilar J; González-Varea C; Gonzalvo MC; Martínez L
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):847-51. PubMed ID: 16361288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality specifications and the assessment of the biochemical risk of atherosclerosis.
Rifai N; Warnick GR
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15234636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation.
Ricós C; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Iglesias N; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M; Domenech MV; Alvarez V
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 15222627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Desirable routine analytical goals for quantities assayed in serum. Discussion paper from the members of the external quality assessment (EQA) Working Group A on analytical goals in laboratory medicine.
Stöckl D; Baadenhuijsen H; Fraser CG; Libeer JC; Petersen PH; Ricós C
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Mar; 33(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 7605829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality assurance system in clinical chemistry.
Albertini A; Signorini C
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8546372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of quality control performance criteria and approved guidelines for upgrading of clinical chemistry laboratory procedures in Alexandria University hospitals.
Rizk MM; el-Badawi NA; Moez PE; Khattab AA
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):288-92. PubMed ID: 19863923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and relevance of evidence in support of guideline recommendations for sleep laboratory investigations.
Hailey D; Tran K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 16262968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evidence-based approach to the development of national dietary guidelines.
Cooper MJ; Zlotkin SH
J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Dec; 103(12 Suppl 2):S28-33. PubMed ID: 14666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
