451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15236170)
1. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Van Gelder RE; Nio CY; Florie J; Bartelsman JF; Snel P; De Jager SW; Van Deventer SJ; Laméris JS; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Gastroenterology; 2004 Jul; 127(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15236170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA; Maccarty RL; Welch TJ; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Gastroenterology; 2003 Aug; 125(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 12891530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps.
Munikrishnan V; Gillams AR; Lees WR; Vaizey CJ; Boulos PB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Oct; 46(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 14530680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of computed tomographic colonography for the screening of colorectal polyp in acromegalic patients: a prospective study.
Ramos O; Boguszewski CL; Teixeira S; De Bem R; Parolim B; Prolla JC
Arq Gastroenterol; 2009; 46(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 19578607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Yun JY; Ro HJ; Park JB; Choi JB; Chung JE; Kim YJ; Suh WH; Lee JK
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 18071278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [CT colonography in daily practice].
Stoker J; Dekker E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(44):A6477. PubMed ID: 24168847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual colonography: identification and differentiation of colorectal lesions using multi-detector computed tomography.
Wessling J; Domagk D; Lugering N; Schierhorn S; Heindel W; Domschke W; Fischbach R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 40(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 16028443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; Wilson LA; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Apr; 2(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 15067626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer.
Fini L; Laghi L; Hassan C; Pestalozza A; Pagano N; Balzarini L; Repici A; Pickhardt PJ; Malesci A
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 24475809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis.
Arnesen RB; Adamsen S; Svendsen LB; Raaschou HO; von Benzon E; Hansen OH
Endoscopy; 2005 Oct; 37(10):937-44. PubMed ID: 16189765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.
Mulhall BP; Veerappan GR; Jackson JL
Ann Intern Med; 2005 Apr; 142(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 15838071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.
Sha J; Chen J; Lv X; Liu S; Chen R; Zhang Z
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):51. PubMed ID: 32423413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.
Rosman AS; Korsten MA
Am J Med; 2007 Mar; 120(3):203-210.e4. PubMed ID: 17349438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
