These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523636)
1. [Determination of birth date by early ultrasonography]. Børdahl E; Moe N Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(16):2112-3. PubMed ID: 1523636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate. Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors. Källén K Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasonic assessment of gestational age and prolonged pregnancy]. Rasmussen S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Nov; 113(27):3366-8. PubMed ID: 8273064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates. Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate? Rowlands S; Royston P Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy. Gardosi J; Vanner T; Francis A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 9236643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records. Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():50-61. PubMed ID: 17803618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prolonged pregnancy: apropos of a series of 102 cases]. Mahjoub S; Ben Hmid R; Dakhli R; Fadhlaoui A; Lebbi I; Zouari F; Khrouf N Tunis Med; 2000 Feb; 78(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 10894049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the post-term pregnancy. McMahon MJ; Kuller JA; Yankowitz J Am Fam Physician; 1996 Aug; 54(2):631-6, 641-2. PubMed ID: 8701841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Determination of the prospective time of labor using ultrasonic fetometry]. Zanke S Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(13):861-4. PubMed ID: 685569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate. Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome. Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of ultrasonography vs clinical factors to estimate date of confinement. McConnon TM; Bowman WP J Fam Pract; 1985 Jul; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3891907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Determination of birth term by early ultrasonic examination--wrong, wrong and wrong again?]. Bratlid D Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Apr; 111(11):1379-81. PubMed ID: 2042162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Estimation of delivery date after withdrawal of oral contraceptives]. Sviggum O; Eik-Nes SH Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Jan; 108(2):136-8, 119. PubMed ID: 3281314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues in pregnancy dating: revisiting the evidence. Hunter LA J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19410210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]