BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523636)

  • 1. [Determination of birth date by early ultrasonography].
    Børdahl E; Moe N
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(16):2112-3. PubMed ID: 1523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
    Källén K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasonic assessment of gestational age and prolonged pregnancy].
    Rasmussen S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Nov; 113(27):3366-8. PubMed ID: 8273064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
    Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?
    Rowlands S; Royston P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy.
    Gardosi J; Vanner T; Francis A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 9236643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records.
    Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():50-61. PubMed ID: 17803618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prolonged pregnancy: apropos of a series of 102 cases].
    Mahjoub S; Ben Hmid R; Dakhli R; Fadhlaoui A; Lebbi I; Zouari F; Khrouf N
    Tunis Med; 2000 Feb; 78(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 10894049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the post-term pregnancy.
    McMahon MJ; Kuller JA; Yankowitz J
    Am Fam Physician; 1996 Aug; 54(2):631-6, 641-2. PubMed ID: 8701841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Determination of the prospective time of labor using ultrasonic fetometry].
    Zanke S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(13):861-4. PubMed ID: 685569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age.
    Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine growth in twin pregnancies: prediction of fetal growth retardation.
    Secher NJ; Kaern J; Hansen PK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3892389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of ultrasonography vs clinical factors to estimate date of confinement.
    McConnon TM; Bowman WP
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Jul; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3891907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Determination of birth term by early ultrasonic examination--wrong, wrong and wrong again?].
    Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Apr; 111(11):1379-81. PubMed ID: 2042162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Estimation of delivery date after withdrawal of oral contraceptives].
    Sviggum O; Eik-Nes SH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Jan; 108(2):136-8, 119. PubMed ID: 3281314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in pregnancy dating: revisiting the evidence.
    Hunter LA
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19410210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.