354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15236429)
1. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
Du P; Tang L
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test.
Cai T; Moskowitz CS
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 15475420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the clinical accuracy of laboratory tests.
Zweig MH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 3355338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Practical application of receiver operating characteristic curve on laboratory diagnosis].
Matsuo S; Takahashi H
Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 8051801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves.
Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 8(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 15566624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting visual field loss in ocular hypertensive patients using wavelet-fourier analysis of GDx scanning laser polarimetry.
Essock EA; Gunvant P; Zheng Y; Garway-Heath DF; Kotecha A; Spratt A
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 17502818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic utility of Wada Memory Asymmetries: sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio characterization.
Loring DW; Bowden SC; Lee GP; Meador KJ
Neuropsychology; 2009 Nov; 23(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19899827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
