353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15236429)
21. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum tumor markers, and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutations for pancreatic cancer.
Wu X; Lu XH; Xu T; Qian JM; Zhao P; Guo XZ; Yang XO; Jiang WJ
Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16808798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Receiver operating curve, an aid in decision making. Principles and applications illustrated with some examples].
Vinatier D; Monnier JC
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(8):981-9. PubMed ID: 3069898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
Tsji I
Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation.
Beck JR; Shultz EK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Jan; 110(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3753562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
Parker CB; DeLong ER
Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A preference-based measure for test performance with an application to prenatal diagnostics.
Felder S; Robra BP
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(21):3696-706. PubMed ID: 16345129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The misuse of predictive value--or why you must consider the odds.
Gambino R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 1809058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests.
Thompson ML
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12925502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Fardy JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A multitest regimen of pain provocation tests as an aid to reduce unnecessary minimally invasive sacroiliac joint procedures.
van der Wurff P; Buijs EJ; Groen GJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16401431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Commentary on "Alternative graphs for diagnostic tests: the agreement chart and the receiver operating characteristic curve".
Goldsmith C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):855-6. PubMed ID: 18687286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
