These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15236433)

  • 1. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
    Wittkowski KM
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2317. PubMed ID: 15236433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 14695640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
    Zou GY
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A more powerful exact test of noninferiority from binary matched-pairs data.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3540-9. PubMed ID: 18314932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 15696504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.
    Imai K
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A signed-rank test for clustered data.
    Datta S; Satten GA
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 17970820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twin analysis on paired comparison data.
    Ozaki K
    Behav Genet; 2008 Mar; 38(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 18040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC; Lee DS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 19319923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact, distribution free confidence intervals for late effects in censored matched pairs.
    Daniel SR
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of matched case-control data with incomplete strata: applying longitudinal approaches.
    Lin IF; Lai MY; Chuang PH
    Epidemiology; 2007 Jul; 18(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 17525695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the performance of indicators of hand-washing practices in rural Indian households.
    Biran A; Rabie T; Schmidt W; Juvekar S; Hirve S; Curtis V
    Trop Med Int Health; 2008 Feb; 13(2):278-85. PubMed ID: 18304276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 17688498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transplantation of haematopoietic stem cells derived from cord blood, bone marrow or peripheral blood: a single centre matched-pair analysis in a heterogeneous risk population.
    Schönberger S; Niehues T; Meisel R; Bernbeck B; Laws HJ; Kögler G; Enzmann J; Wernet P; Göbel U; Dilloo D
    Klin Padiatr; 2004; 216(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15565551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments.
    Garner M; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 19299883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in 24-hour urinary diaries of asymptomatic North American adults.
    Mueller E; Latini J; Lux M; Stablein U; Brubaker L; Kreder K; Fitzgerald MP
    J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):490-2. PubMed ID: 15643226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing apples with pairs.
    Bangdiwala SI
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2013; 20(1):99-100. PubMed ID: 23489363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
    Braun TM; Alonzo TA
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16542245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.