BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237011)

  • 1. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.
    Ubeda A; Labastida R; Dexeus S
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 15237011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19022435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysteroscopic permanent tubal sterilization using a nitinol-dacron intratubal device without anaesthesia in the outpatient setting: procedure feasibility and effectiveness.
    Litta P; Cosmi E; Sacco G; Saccardi C; Ciavattini A; Ambrosini G
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Dec; 20(12):3419-22. PubMed ID: 16085664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Kmak DC; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 18588851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysteroscopic female sterilization with Essure in an outpatient setting.
    Andersson S; Eriksson S; Mints M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):743-6. PubMed ID: 19412802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of Essure placement in intrauterine device users.
    Mascaro M; Mariño M; Vicens-Vidal M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 18602048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia.
    Lopes P; Gibon E; Linet T; Philippe HJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jun; 138(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 17822834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization.
    Arjona JE; Miño M; Cordón J; Povedano B; Pelegrin B; Castelo-Branco C
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1182-6. PubMed ID: 18201703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Essure treatment of hydrosalpinges.
    Hitkari JA; Singh SS; Shapiro HM; Leyland N
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 17490660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysteroscopic sterilization in patients with a Mirena intrauterine device: transition from extended interval to permanent contraception.
    Tatalovich JM; Anderson TL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 20226413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.
    Duffy S; Marsh F; Rogerson L; Hudson H; Cooper K; Jack S; Hunter D; Philips G
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16225573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placement of the Essure permanent birth control device with fluoroscopic guidance: a novel method for tubal sterilization.
    McSwain H; Shaw C; Hall LD
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 16002509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral placement of the Adiana device after failed bilateral placement of the Essure device for hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Gimpelson RJ; Wagner CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):660-1. PubMed ID: 20728829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.
    Nichols M; Carter JF; Fylstra DL; Childers M;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 16962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases.
    Moses AW; Burgis JT; Bacon JL; Risinger J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.