BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237118)

  • 1. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an impaction graft: follow-up study.
    Arif M; Sivananthan S; Choon DS
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Jun; 12(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15237118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate.
    Haddad FS; Duncan CP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Gross AE; Chandler HP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):945-50. PubMed ID: 12063328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
    Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Goff TAJ; Bobak P
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lim CT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Hwang KL; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 28130016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
    Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Cortical Strut Allograft After Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lim CT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Hwang KL; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 28110850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.
    Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():259-74. PubMed ID: 16951098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical strut allografts for the treatment of femoral fractures and deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Logel KJ; Lachiewicz PF; Schmale GA; Kelley SS
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1999; 8(3):163-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 12132861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.
    Howie DW; Callary SA; McGee MA; Russell NC; Solomon LB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3314-21. PubMed ID: 20680531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. A comparison of three systems from four centres.
    Masterson EL; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Rosenberg A; Cabanela M; Gross M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Nov; 79(6):908-13. PubMed ID: 9393902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Femoral revision using cemented stem and compacted bone graft: femoral migration analysis].
    Marmorat JL; Leymarie JB; Piriou P; Norton M; Judet T
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Apr; 92(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16800068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.
    Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study.
    Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Garcia-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1457-64. PubMed ID: 22058294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
    Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.
    Arumugam G; Nanjayan SK; Quah C; Wraighte P; Howard P
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Dec; 25(8):1279-84. PubMed ID: 26399609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.