These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237347)

  • 1. [Evaluation of the display quality of different modalities in digital radiology].
    Lehmkuhl L; Mulzer J; Teichgraeber U; Gillessen C; Ehrenstein T; Ricke J
    Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):1031-8. PubMed ID: 15237347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs.
    Buls N; Shabana W; Verbeek P; Pevenage P; De Mey J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):738-43. PubMed ID: 17709363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
    Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Findings of digital intensive or bed lung radiographs at the monitor vs. hard copy: a clinical ROC study].
    Pärtan G; Mosser H; Tekusch A; Urban M; Augustin I; Hruby W
    Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 7948983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Performance study of teleradiology network systems with CRT monitors: ROC analysis of an observation study of simulated lung nodules].
    Takizawa M; Sone S; Oguchi K; Maruyama Y; Watanabe T; Gomi K; Wako T; Okazaki Y; Momose M; Imai S; Maruyama A; Sakai F
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 56(14):1061-5. PubMed ID: 9014469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Oschatz E; Prokop M; Scharitzer M; Weber M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1472-6. PubMed ID: 15365756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR
    Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 10580946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
    Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
    Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Arnadóttir E; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Lundin A; Lyttkens K; Kheddache K; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.