400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237509)
1. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
Lucas R
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
Bourne RW
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker & Hurwitz in the dock & defrocked.
Lucas R
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Jun; (314):9-38. PubMed ID: 16173382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
Roden GJ
Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
Bradford CS
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
Schirmer JT
Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
Dailard C
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
Ezzard MM
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Graines S; Wyatt J
Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion politics and health insurance reform.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(27):2589-91. PubMed ID: 19955513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law.
Funk N
Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future".
Weddington S
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
Moses MF
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
Weissmann R
Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Victim or accomplice? Crime, medical malpractice, and the construction of the aborting woman in American case law, 1860s-1970.
Reagan L
Columbia J Gend Law; 2001; 10(2):311-32. PubMed ID: 16184654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Bazzelle RY
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
