126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237827)
1. An efficient robust sound classification algorithm for hearing aids.
Nordqvist P; Leijon A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3033-41. PubMed ID: 15237827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Computationally Efficient Sound Environment Classifier for Hearing Aids.
Gil-Pita R; Ayllón D; Ranilla J; Llerena-Aguilar C; Díaz I
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 62(10):2358-68. PubMed ID: 25935024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic User Preferences Selection of Smart Hearing Aid Using BioAid.
Siddiqui HUR; Saleem AA; Raza MA; Zafar K; Russo R; Dudley S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
