These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237870)

  • 1. Misfit and functional loading of craniofacial implants.
    Miller KL; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 15237870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical evaluation of craniofacial osseointegration retention systems.
    Del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; Rangert B; Tan HK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7672853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Console abutment loading in craniofacial osseointegration.
    Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; del Valle V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 9581411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial osseointegrated implant-induced strain distribution: a numerical study.
    del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 9109270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-supported facial prostheses.
    Baima RF
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(4):50-4, 56-64. PubMed ID: 9520655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of prosthesis design and impression techniques on human cortical bone strain around oral implants under load.
    Akça K; Kokat AM; Sahin S; Iplikcioglu H; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 19269878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a surgical positioner for bone-anchored facial prostheses.
    Reisberg DJ; Habakuk SW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 9197103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a newly designed single-stage craniofacial implant: a pilot study.
    Khamis MM; Medra A; Gauld J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 18992571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study.
    Wright RF; Zemnick C; Wazen JJ; Asher E
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 18544137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A methodology to study the effects of prosthesis misfit over time: an in vivo model.
    Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 19885410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Extra-oral implants: surgical procedures].
    Brix M; Badie-Modiri B; Delcampe P
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Aug; 102(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 11599144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical scan analysis to detect minor misfit on implant-supported superstructures.
    Tahmaseb A; Mercelis P; de Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1344-50. PubMed ID: 22167442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures.
    Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 16161742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osseointegration tissue prosthesis in the rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects.
    Connor JN; Henry PJ; Wall CD
    Aust Prosthodont Soc Bull; 1985 Dec; 15():55-61. PubMed ID: 3869896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.