These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237885)

  • 1. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusion and restorative materials.
    Leinfelder KF; Yarnell G
    Dent Clin North Am; 1995 Apr; 39(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 7781831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Wear and different restorative materials--a review].
    Beyth N; Sharon E; Lipovetsky M; Smidt A
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jul; 24(3):6-14, 91. PubMed ID: 17091620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach.
    Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Apr; 22(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 7769526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.
    Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
    Bartlett D; Sundaram G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. One-year results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Ohlmann B; Uekermann J; Dreyhaupt J; Schmitter M; Mussotter K; Rammelsberg P
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 17027139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva.
    Willershausen B; Köttgen C; Ernst CP
    Eur J Med Res; 2001 Oct; 6(10):433-9. PubMed ID: 11698230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins.
    Leinfelder KF
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 3316043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials.
    Rios D; Honório HM; Francisconi LF; Magalhães AC; de Andrade Moreira Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18191012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusal wear of metal-free ceramic-filled polymer crowns after 2 years in service.
    Stober T; Dreyhaupt J; Lehnung U; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 18546773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.