These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15237885)

  • 21. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of elevated temperatures on various restorative materials: an in vitro study.
    Bose RS; Mohan B; Lakshminarayanan L
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 16372794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth.
    da Cunha MR; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 17212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incisal and occlusal tooth wear and wear of some prosthodontic materials. An epidemiological and clinical study.
    Ekfeldt A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1989; 65():1-62. PubMed ID: 2690396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth.
    Ghazal M; Steiner M; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 18546774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?
    Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):689-92. PubMed ID: 16563492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH; Jelen B; Mehl A; Hickel R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discoloration of restorative materials after bleaching application.
    Rosentritt M; Lang R; Plein T; Behr M; Handel G
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15709495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials.
    Hudson JD; Goldstein GR; Georgescu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 8778391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of dental restoration type and material on periodontal health.
    Ababnaeh KT; Al-Omari M; Alawneh TN
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2011; 9(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 22238739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with experiences of health problems related to dental restorative materials.
    Naimi-Akbar A; Svedberg P; Alexanderson K; Carlstedt-Duke B; Ekstrand J; Englund GS
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 41(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 22963525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel.
    Ghazal M; Yang B; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 17688934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study.
    Milosevic A; Burnside G
    J Dent; 2016 Jan; 44():13-9. PubMed ID: 26542166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recognition and prevention of failures in clinical dentistry. Aesthetic dental materials--posterior.
    Martin FE
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1991 Oct; 11():178-88. PubMed ID: 1844029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.