314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15238651)
1. Assessment and evaluation of the radiological situation in the late phase of a nuclear accident.
Gering F; Weiss W; Wirth E; Stapel R; Jacob P; Müller H; Pröhl G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15238651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation monitoring strategy: factors to be considered.
Lahtinen J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):79-82. PubMed ID: 15238661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response in the late phase to a radiological emergency.
Morrey M; Nisbet A; Thome D; Savkin M; Hoe S; Brynildsen L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15238663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protective actions in the late phase--intervention criteria and decision-making.
Hedemann-Jensen P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 15238655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the confidence in long range atmospheric transport models be increased? The pan-european experience of ensemble.
Galmarini S; Bianconi R; Klug W; Mikkelsen T; Addis R; Andronopoulos S; Astrup P; Baklanov A; Bartniki J; Bartzis JC; Bellasio R; Bompay F; Buckley R; Bouzom M; Champion H; D'Amours R; Davakis E; Eleveld H; Geertsema GT; Glaab H; Kollax M; Ilvonen M; Manning A; Pechinger U; Persson C; Polreich E; Potemski S; Prodanova M; Saltbones J; Slaper H; Sofiev MA; Syrakov D; Sørensen JH; Van der Auwera L; Valkama I; Zelazny R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):19-24. PubMed ID: 15238650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is there a need for hydrological modelling in decision support systems for nuclear emergencies.
Raskob W; Heling R; Zheleznyak M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 15238667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergency management in the early phase.
Crick M; McKenna T; Buglova E; Winkler G; Martincic R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 15238649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International exchange of emergency phase information and assessments: an aid to national/international decision makers.
Sullivan TJ; Chino M; Ehrhardt J; Shershakov V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15238671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ongoing efforts to improve the international nuclear and radiological emergency response.
Ugletveit F; Molhoek W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):149-50. PubMed ID: 15238675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing nuclear emergency response through international cooperation.
Ugletveit F; Aaltonen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):147-8. PubMed ID: 15238674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Summary and conclusions: capabilities and challenges.
Kelly GN; Jones R; Crick MJ; Weiss W; Morrey M; Lochard J; French S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15238677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Off-site nuclear emergency management.
Miska H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 15238662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness.
Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident.
Sinkko K; Hämäläinen RP; Hänninen R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15238670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintaining competence in radiological protection in emergency situations: a challenge for the 21st century.
Weiss W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15238676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Better use of European (regional) resources.
Rojas-Palma C; Hardeman F; Miska H; Duranova T; Cabanekova H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):115-7. PubMed ID: 15238668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The long-term management of nuclear emergencies: the principles.
Baverstock K; Cherp A; Gray P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):3-5. PubMed ID: 15238648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Belarus: towards a new post-chernobyl rehabilitation strategy.
Trofimchik Z
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):141-5. PubMed ID: 15238673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical evaluation of the strategy project.
Howard BJ; Liland A; Beresford NA; Andersson KG; Cox G; Gil JM; Hunt J; Nisbet A; Oughton DH; Voigt G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 15238658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A United States perspective on long-term management of areas contaminated with radioactive materials.
Jones CR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):75-7. PubMed ID: 15238660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
